F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” and Brett Easton Ellis’ “Less Than Zero” Essay

Explore the function of the narrator in F. Scott Fitzgeralds The large Gatsby and Brett Easton Ellis slight Than energyPublished in 1925 by compose F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby, is considered a literary come apartic by roughly(prenominal) critics. The eponymous allegory is arrange in the Roaring 1920s lay World War 1 and tells the tale of Jay Gatsby with the novels narrator, Nick Carraway. The exposition begins when we ar told of the socio-cultural break open between the upper class of America, by a character who has just moved to Long Island from Minnesota. The draw separation between West Egg and East Egg is an thinker explored by Nick, who is a resident of the lower-upper class West Egg.Through reveal the novel, it tolerate be observed that evets that occur argon a direct twin to the life of Scott Fitzgerald, as he projects characteristics of twain Gatsby and Nick that were similar to his own. It is astray believed that the book is written in a manner that is cynical of the Ameri tail Dream and of the elitist family, in a bias fashion that favours Gatsby. Conversely, Less Than Zero is a novel flummox in the 1980s and tells the story of slopped college students, who lead hedonistic lifestyles with the security of their parents wealth.Brett Easton Ellis primary novel in his body of work is written during the years following the Vietnam War of economic prosperity in Reagans America and highlights the fragmented ordering caused by passionless relationships between friends and family and the deprivation of morality present in upper class America. The both novels contrast in the cities that they are set in The Great Gatsby is set in New Yorks Long Island, whilst Less Than Zero is set in California on the opposite coast of America. However the demeanor of the two generations is quite similar, and is reflective of the influence of money on higher-class cabaret during the respective periods.In The Great Gatsby, Nick Carraway i s not only the narrator, nevertheless in any case a character that actively participates in the novel and it his assessment that dictates how the proofreader perceives another(prenominal) characters. One obvious example of this is in the novels title, as the epithet Great is used to describe a character that the reader has not still met. This suggests that Nick Carraway idolizes Gatsby in some aspects and to some degree, aspires to what Gatsby represents. Produced like the supper, no doubt, out of a caterers basket. This short pull out is taken from a section where Nick is describing a lavish companionship that is frequently held by Gatsby.The metaphor implies that Gatsby is almost God-like in the way he is able to throw extravagant parties up to now remains anonymous to those that attend. During the 1920s, at that place was a period of what was known as prohibition, where all alcohol was banned, and yet flock are often described drinking throughout The Great Gatsby.This could be a condemnation of upper class auberge, as it suggests they are just as immoral, if not much so, than the lower classes. Fitzgerald himself went from a family of mediocrity to a sudden rise in splendor through his writings, and can therefore relate to the awe that one might feel when acclimatizing to much(prenominal) a society. Less Than Zeros narrator, ashes, does not represent its author in the same way as Nick does, however Easton-Ellis uses the Great Compromiser to magnify the issues that surrounded affluent college students during the 80s. Clay often negatively portrays the actions of other characters, which can be seen as an act of hypocrisy. For example,Because you both stole a quarter gram of cocaine from me the last time I left(a) my door open. Thats why.At this point, Clay accuses his sisters of stealing his cocaine, which they put quite a little to him leaving his door unlocked. This may be a credit rating to the lack of privacy or a lack of trust indoo rs society to such a degree that one cannot trust even their closest family.Nick Carraway is arguably a biased narrator, through his romanticized and idealised description of the novels protagonist and adversely, his foil, tom Buchanan. On their first encounter Nick describes Gatsbys gestures with authority for example,He had one of those high-flown smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it, that you may come crossways four or five times in life. It faced, or seemed to face, the consentient external world for an instant and then concentrated on you with an supine prejudice in your favor. It understood you just as far as you wanted to be understood, believed in you as you would like to believe in yourself This quotation epitomizes Nicks admiration for Gatsby before he has in good order met him and implies that he has already formulated an opinion based upon rumours he has perceive but also based on the party Gatsby invited him to. Once again, this is may be seen as a c ondemnation of American society by Fitzgerald who shows that capitalist and superficiality was a major factor in shaping an individual.Gatsbys flawless persona does deteriorate as the novel progresses and as Gatsby comes close to achieving his dream, however Nick appears to glaze over this and as a result, preserves Gatsbys greatness to the reader. The use of the affectation old run around throughout Gatsbys communication with Nick highlights a friendship that is uncomplete formal nor informal but rather one of an illusionary nature. This is to place that Gatsby uses the affectation in order to evoke a more appealing, talented persona. Despite Nick seeing through his faade, he chooses to ignore the matter, instead only becomes more infatuated with what Gatsby represents.What part of the affection West? I inquired casually.San FranciscoI seeIt is apparent that Nick knows San Francisco is not in the Middle West but rather on the west coast yet he chooses not to argue as if Gatsby s word is uniquely truth. Claire Stocks puts this infatuation down to a likeness that both men pct which is that both men seem to be the victims of insufficient or thwarted inheritances They are both pressure to work for their living. It can be suggested that towards the end of Less Than Zero, Clay wants to leave this society as he narrates, My eyes backup wandering off the screen and to the two green exit signs that come over the two doors in the back of the theater This occurs whilst Clay, Blair and Kim are in the cinema watching a gory film and highlights that Clay does in fact have some form of morality despite the actions that he part-takes in. Easton-Ellis reveals a character that is torn between existence moral or following the hedonistic life he is so easily acclimatized to.Fitzgerald also uses Nick Carraway as a way of criticizing the society that he strives to be a part of. This is evident in Chapter 2, where Nick spends time with Tom, myrtle and Mr. Wilson, I was wi thin and without, simultaneously enthrall and repelled by the inexhaustible regeneration of life. At this point, Nick may be referring to the variety of classes that are present, as Myrtle and Mr. Wilson are of a lower class, himself of middle class and Tom from the upper echelons of society. It may be seen that Fitzgerald could not stand the behavior of the people he became associated with, however realized that their behavior was a result of what he sought after, in terms of the American dream and therefore feels enchanted by the hedonistic nature of the upper class. Nevertheless, Fitzgerald also highlights the vast socio-cultural divide between classes and as such presents the reader with an ambiguous view of fractured relationships.Clay also presents his own society with undertones of disdain, being cynical of the netherworld through his direct and succinct account of various events that take place. He rarely places emotion or opinion in his description of events and as a res ult, it seems that he is more of a trustworthy narrator. This is most evident when he recounts the viewing of a blub movie, It looks like a toolbox and Im confused for a minute and Blair walks out of the room. And he takes out an ice pick and what looks like a wire hanger and a pile of nails and then a thin, large knife and he comes toward the girl and Daniel smiles and nudges me in the ribs. The repeated use of polysyndeton gives the reader the impression that Clay is not flop viewing the movie instead, he is almost analyzing it as if it were a novel.The lack of sensory description also implies that Clay is trying to distance himself from this and that he sees the crude and disgusting nature of what he is being shown. At this time, snuff films had just been exposed and were not an unknown phenomenon. Therefore, Easton-Ellis may be suggesting that society has lost its moral compass/guidance, being reduced to ignoring such alarming acts. However, in spite of this, Clay does offer himself as a more intellectual individual compared to other characters, by the way he looks at the billboard that is titled Disappear Here. Evidently he does not choose to disappear and instead stays amongst the morally obsolete society that he is attached to and this ultimately leads to the dnouement in which he is forced to leave his society.Both novels differ in the tone in which they are written though the contexts are very similar despite being in diverse decades. On the one hand, there is Nick who is biased towards one specific character and seems to show disdain for the society that he once strived for, and on the other, Clay, who has a more direct approach to chronicle and more expressively communicates the plot to the reader. Overall, the two narrators are used to direct to very different ideas that are relevant to their contexts.The Great Gatsby is narrated such that the reader is almost forced into liking Gatsby despite his clear superficiality, which is upheld by piff ling objects such as real books and medals with authentic looks. Less Than Zero poses are more critical view of society, with the narrator becoming confused by the moral ambiguity and generally growing to hate the society that he belongs to as it has been reduced to individualism and by an large a fractured society whereby people are afraid to merge.